Image For Activity Cover
APC: Contingency Management: Dominic DePhilippis, PhD
Faculty


Dominick DePhilippis, PhD

Dr. DePhilippis is a licensed clinical psychologist with more than 30 years of experience as a clinician, researcher, and educator, predominantly, in the field of addictions treatment. He earned his Ph.D in Clinical Psychology in 1992 from Hahnemann University in Philadelphia, PA. He serves as the Deputy National Mental Health Director for Substance Use Disorders (SUD) in the Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention in the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).  He has particular interests and expertise in expanding access to evidence-based SUD treatment and measurement-based SUD care.  He is a nationally recognized subject matter expert in Contingency Management (CM) whose work in implementing CM has been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and featured in media reports in the New York Times, the Washington Post, Scientific American, and National Public Radio.  He is a trainer in Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Substance Use Disorders.  Dr. DePhilippis also is a Member of the Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers.


Learning Objectives
This presentation will begin by identifying the challenges to recovery from substance use disorders (SUD); and, how the current methamphetamine crisis serves as an exemplar of those challenges. We then will review the behavioral principles that can be applied to meet those challenges and support recovery from SUD. We will describe how Contingency Management (CM) procedurally applies those behavioral principles in strengthening behaviors such as abstinence from substances. The peer-reviewed, published evidence of CM effectiveness also will be presented. Finally, the presentation will review counter-points to rebut common critiques of CM including misperceptions of it as bribery and a threat to patients’ internal motivation for recovery.

Objectives:
The attendees will be able to:
1. Identify the challenges to recovery from substance use disorders (SUD).
2. Differentiate the rationale and methods for Contingency Management (CM).
3. Distinguish the various applications of CM to SUD treatment.
4. Refute common critiques of CM.
5. Describe the evidence supporting the effectiveness of CM in the treatment of SUD.
Summary
Availability: On-Demand
Expires on Dec 01, 2026
Cost: FREE
Credit Offered:
1.5 CME Credits
1.5 Other Professionals Credits
Recommended
 
American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry
The content on this site is intended solely to inform and educate medical professionals. This site shall not be used for medical advice and is not a substitute for the advice or treatment of a qualified medical professional.


 
400 Massasoit Avenue
Suite 307
East Providence, RI 02914
cmecpd@aaap.org



About
Advocacy
Membership
Fellowship
Education and Resources
Training Events

 
Powered By